The article discusses the socio-economic benefits of climate change mitigation measures by comparing traditional and future land management practices. It is indicated that traditional agricultural and forestry practices in many cases have not been sustainable due to their negative environmental impacts, including soil degradation, loss of biodiversity, and increased greenhouse gas emissions. These impacts, in turn, lead to long-term economic risks, reducing agricultural productivity and increasing costs related to soil restoration and agricultural inputs.

In contrast, the article provides information about future-oriented land management practices that focus on sustainability and climate resilience, such as agroforestry, reforestation, and controlled drainage. These practices not only reduce greenhouse gas emissions but also enhance soil health, increase biodiversity, and improve the resilience of agricultural to climate change. Although these practices require higher initial investments, they offer significant long-term economic benefits, including improved productivity and the preservation of ecosystem services. The article highlights the importance of transitioning to these practices to ensure long-term socio-economic sustainability and resilience.

The article “The Socio-economic benefits of climate change mitigation measures: A comparison between traditional and future land management practices and their productivity in the long term” available HERE>>>